Media The Last of Us Part II

[ZaCHw117]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

 

[GasparZizou]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

Could we get one purge day? To post whatever we want?

We need a porn gif storm, it needs to happen.

I remember people used to post porn on the down low like 3 years ago.

 

[ZaCHw117]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

Could we get one purge day? To post whatever we want?

We need a porn gif storm, it needs to happen.

I remember people used to post porn on the down low like 3 years ago.

there's still some user's visitor pages that you can scope out and post some noice tites on erry once in a while

 

[Snake Plissken]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

same with the gf.

No room for prudes.

Reported! She influencing and filling your mind with pure filth, Snake! You shall not spread such filth in this sacred place.

I'm one to talk though - I've seen enough Riley Reid gifs embedded in my mind for a whole lifetime.

She didn't influence anything that wasn't already there.

 

[ironwez20]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

I'm only on it for the fandom stuff and gifs and news and porn gifs. All other post are whining and bitching about somthing . The funniest things from Tumblr are people who take post to seriously, or are "triggered" by it

 

[ZaCHw117]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

That's my wife in a nutshell, only uses it to watch porn gifs.

I'm only on it for the fandom stuff and gifs and news and porn gifs. All other post are whining and bitching about somthing . The funniest things from Tumblr are people who take post to seriously, or are "triggered" by it

i guess that just means...

I like to make an ass out of myslef.

HAHAHAHA
>feelsgoodman.gif
>masturbation is self improvment
>GZ duznt like pr0n
>CUCK

 

[GasparZizou]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

Plus size forest child, squirrel-kin, orthodemiromantic.
DID, PTSD, self-diagnosed.
pronouns: xyr, xor, xem

What a beautiful soul.

 

[ZaCHw117]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

I'm only on it for the fandom stuff and gifs and news and porn gifs. All other post are whining and bitching about somthing . The funniest things from Tumblr are people who take post to seriously, or are "triggered" by it

dat rule 34 tho

 

[GasparZizou]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

i r-really like pron guise, i promise, im just like u

We believe you.

 

[FSLAR]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

Also, there's nothing wrong with sexualizing characters for your target audience and when appropriate.

There's nothing wrong with sexuality, period.

No wonder why my generation doesn't get laid.

But men don't get sexualized waaaah

Spoiler:

Women, only one thing in their minds

To be honest, overly sexualized women in games can vary when you realize it's mostly optional, but then you see nude Raiden and Johnny in MGS 1/2 which is mandatory. And a shirt less Snake in the middle of the ****ing arctic and wherever the **** Gronzy Grad was but hey - everything thinks Anita Sarkeesian's problem is 'SHE'S A WOMAN LUL'.

 

[GasparZizou]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

To be honest, overly sexualized women in games can vary when you realize it's mostly optional, but then you see nude Raiden and Johnny in MGS 1/2 which is mandatory. And a shirt less Snake in the middle of the ****ing arctic and wherever the **** Gronzy Grad was but hey - everything thinks Anita Sarkeesian's problem is 'SHE'S A WOMAN LUL'.

Absolutely, that's why I said when it's appropriate, for instance, you can't be mad at Duke Nukem, but if they were to portray women in TLOU like they do in Duke Nukem, that'd be a problem. Don't worry about Anita Sarkeesian's problems, if there isn't any, she'll make up one.

 

[FSLAR]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

Absolutely, that's why I said when it's appropriate, for instance, you can't be mad at Duke Nukem, but if they were to portray women in TLOU like they do in Duke Nukem, that'd be a problem. Don't worry about Anita Sarkeesian's problems, if there isn't any, she'll make up one.

She's so bad, even my non-gamer friends know about her

 

[Spanbauer]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

Female protagonists in video games seem to "suck" in comparison to male protagonists because female protagonists are still relatively new to the video gaming world. Creators have always struggled with writing female characters that can captivate an audience of mostly men, which is why we have characters like the over-sexualized Lara Croft and Samus, whose gender had to be revealed after players were already fully invested so that they wouldn't quit the game. It used to be incredibly controversial to even have a female protagonist in a video game. We've come a long way.

This is correct, but this also needs to be squared with the fact that we've had a million male characters in video games (and action films) who weren't captivating in any way shape or form. In fact the vast majority of video game characters suck, period. The notion that the female characters must be held to a higher standard & subject to more scrunity than their male counterparts in order to justify their presence in a male-dominated field is quite frankly sexism in a nutshell.

 

[GasparZizou]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

>it's still about being against female characters instead of being against feminist garbage.
I know, I know, without an artificial narrative there wouldn't be an argument.

>it's about getting even.
>it's ok if a character sucks if it's a girl.
>we can't hold female characters to a higher standard
>we need to hold them to a lower standard, it's ok that's not sexist.
The oxymorons of the SJW no longer surprise me.

 

[pturtle]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

This is correct, but this also needs to be squared with the fact that we've had a million male characters in video games (and action films) who weren't captivating in any way shape or form. In fact the vast majority of video game characters suck, period. The notion that the female characters must be held to a higher standard & subject to more scrunity than their male counterparts in order to justify their presence in a male-dominated field is quite frankly sexism in a nutshell.

But are you just making things up because you want to argue? I literally said the same thing you did in the first part of your post, i can just digest bad male characters better because theres no agenda. Female characters aren’t being held to a higher standard I don’t really know where you guys are coming up with this stuff

Should I post the video again, where the creator of the game basically saids he had an agenda with TLOU? I could understand if I were looking too much into things and reaching in order to crap on female characters but the source of all my info is literally the writer/director of the game, and I’m concerned he might go to far pushing that agenda in the sequel, why is that turning everyone here into White Knights?

 

[OFGhost]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

Also, there's nothing wrong with sexualizing characters for your target audience and when appropriate.

There's nothing wrong with sexuality, period.

No wonder why my generation doesn't get laid.

But men don't get sexualized waaaah

Spoiler:

Women, only one thing in their minds

There's nothing wrong with sexualizing characters. Sexualization isn't inherently sexist. What's sexist is aiming that sexualization (for the most part) at a specific gender, which is what video games used to do. At a certain point it becomes ridiculous and annoying, and Japan in particular loves to do that. Now we seem to be moving in a different direction, which is good. I like me some sexy men.

And I don't think female characters are held to a higher standard. I think that any character is held to a higher standard than they would have been in, say, the 80's and 90's. The difference here is that female characters were few and far between in the those decades, and I'm not just talking action games. Nintendo is a good example of this. In fact, name off every iconic video game character you can think of and the ratio of male/female would probably be somewhere around 4 to 1. Not that this is a huge problem to me--it's just a fact that should be considered. I mentioned Lara Croft and Samus because those are the only two that most people who aren't super into games would think of.

 

[FriendlySamurai]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

Hey Laura Croft validated large breasted girls everywhere who were too afraid to do a handstand on a rock wall

Is it weird this thread is making me want to dust off Outlaw Volleyball?

 

[OFGhost]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

Hey Laura Croft validated large breasted girls everywhere who were too afraid to do a handstand on a rock wall

Is it weird this thread is making me want to dust off Outlaw Volleyball?

Nah. It kind of makes me want to play Dead or Alive.

 

[Spanbauer]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

...i can just digest bad male characters better because theres no agenda. Female characters aren’t being held to a higher standard I don’t really know where you guys are coming up with this stuff

Your focus with "the agenda", research there-of & stand-offishness to it is in itself showing a higher standard has been set; how much time did you spend researching what agenda may be behind the sexual identity choice of Doom's protagonist, for example?

...I’m concerned he might go to far pushing that agenda in the sequel, why is that turning everyone here into White Knights?

The fact that this is something that concerns you, when it wouldn't have even crossed your mind had the protagonist remained Joel, again exposes the issue at play.

 

[pturtle]

Re: The Last of Us Part II (Confirmed, trailer posted)

Your focus with "the agenda", research there-of & stand-offishness to it is in itself showing a higher standard has been set; how much time did you spend researching what agenda may be behind the sexual identity choice of Doom's protagonist, for example?



The fact that this is something that concerns you, when it wouldn't have even crossed your mind had the protagonist remained Joel, again exposes the issue at play.

Or…

I had no idea there was an agenda until the creator of the game came out and said he had one when making the first game. That news pops up on sites I frequently visit, I didn’t do some thorough research about it. Had Druckman not said anything, I probably wouldn’t have noticed, but after playing the game, and finding out he’s an uber feminist that did indeed have agenda makes me nervous for the sequel. Why is that wrong again?

You seem to be assuming a lot just to find an argument to some how try and expose me as some sexist pig