Star Trek: Discovery

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
It's already been renewed for a third season three episodes into its current season so not sure about your cancelation prediction..

I hate to break it to you but there has been no announcement of a renewal for Season 3. The show is so costly and they haven't seen much in return for their investment that it most likely won't be renewed. I could be wrong.... we'll see.
 
I hate to break it to you but there has been no announcement of a renewal for Season 3. The show is so costly and they haven't seen much in return for their investment that it most likely won't be renewed. I could be wrong.... we'll see.
I think is ok. I was starve from Trek for so long, I take anything. After the end.of S2, we have Picard coming in 10 months, and we have Section 31 in Summer, plus some possible animation.

So there are still a lot of Trek coming. For how long we dont know. Enjoy what we have now, and dont think about the future. Trek future is in the hands of CBS, not us.

Sent from my SM-N9600 using Tapatalk
 
I hate to break it to you but there has been no announcement of a renewal for Season 3. The show is so costly and they haven't seen much in return for their investment that it most likely won't be renewed. I could be wrong.... we'll see.

No you are correct...while it has not been officially renewed...folks at CBS have made it clear at TV conferences that the official renewal is a formality as it is all but guaranteed to be renewed. The showrunner Alex Kurtzman has shared that the writers are also hard at work on Season 3. You have to remember that CBS built an entire streaming platform around the show...it's not going anywhere any time soon. While it was running last year it was deemed to be the number one most popular streaming show in the U.S. and the U.K. by a wide margin. CBS does not even fund the show's budget, Netflix considers the show to be so valuable that they finance the production budget in exchange for being able to stream the show outside of the U.S. I can appreciate that it is frustrating to see something that one dislikes be successful...if it failed it would just go away...but like it or dislike it...it is a critical and commercial hit and those are really the only measures that will determine its longevity.
 
Is ok to exprese his opinion. I think he is right too. Trek is a difficult line itself. But that doesnt mean I cant think of ways to share some DSC to this smaller groups of Trek friends. Of course, market dictates that, otherwise it will be my personal fun. Making lots of them means a lot more fun. I am always producing new Trek figures [emoji16]

I am like a junky producing the drugs that I like [emoji1] or I am a playboy, having a new girl friend every few months and they all have the physical features or appearances that I like [emoji7]


Sent from my SM-N9600 using Tapatalk

You are a gentleman Nanjin!
 
I don’t even know why I continue watching this show. The protracted “death “ scene in the last episode was cringe worthy. I think the biggest problem STD has is weak characters. We never see them outside work, I think last episode was the first time we saw Saru’s pad. Most of the bridge crew are nobodies, they’re just there to push buttons when told to do so. They don’t socialise, we never see them interact with each other in situations not involving work, thus I never buy them as a crew.

I keep telling myself this is the last episode I will watch but the whole thing is like a terrible car crash that you can’t look away from. The fact that it’s only available to watch one episode a week helps I guess because I’d never manage to binge through it all at once. As a weekly bitter pill to swallow it’s just about manageable.
 
I don’t even know why I continue watching this show. The protracted “death “ scene in the last episode was cringe worthy. I think the biggest problem STD has is weak characters. We never see them outside work, I think last episode was the first time we saw Saru’s pad. Most of the bridge crew are nobodies, they’re just there to push buttons when told to do so. They don’t socialise, we never see them interact with each other in situations not involving work, thus I never buy them as a crew.

I keep telling myself this is the last episode I will watch but the whole thing is like a terrible car crash that you can’t look away from. The fact that it’s only available to watch one episode a week helps I guess because I’d never manage to binge through it all at once. As a weekly bitter pill to swallow it’s just about manageable.
Yup. I think TOS Chekov was a lot better, at least he talked to himself.

Anything that has a history has a burden. Trek bared this heavily and seems to me DSC spending every chance they have to link up to its predecessors. I do hope they eventually develop their own unique characters, then link with other coming series like Picard and that animated series.

Sent from my SM-N9600 using Tapatalk
 
The first season was strong but closer to the Kelvin movies than traditional Star Trek television series have been. Season 2 takes the cinematic scope and scale of the Kelvin movies and marries it to more traditional Star Trek storytelling and the result has proven to be the strongest Trek series since DS9 premiered in 1993. Great time to be a Star Trek fan with such an amazing show currently airing and more on the way from the same folks who brought us this one!
 
meantime, revised Michael
d1091cb02cb58a999311604a12518b1c.jpg


Sent from my SM-N9600 using Tapatalk
 
Not loving how STD is feeling the need to explain the relatively lo tech in TOS. I think we can overlook that, given it’s over 50 years old.

Both STD and the Abramsverse have done a good job finding a middle ground between the look of TOS and the hi-tech expectations of today’s audiences.
 
Not loving how STD is feeling the need to explain the relatively lo tech in TOS. I think we can overlook that, given it’s over 50 years old.

Both STD and the Abramsverse have done a good job finding a middle ground between the look of TOS and the hi-tech expectations of today’s audiences.

I think WE can probably overlook it...but unfortunately for every rational viewer like you there is an angry nerd waiting to jump down the throats of the show's writing staff for stuff like that.
 
I don’t even know why I continue watching this show. The protracted “death “ scene in the last episode was cringe worthy. I think the biggest problem STD has is weak characters. We never see them outside work, I think last episode was the first time we saw Saru’s pad. Most of the bridge crew are nobodies, they’re just there to push buttons when told to do so. They don’t socialise, we never see them interact with each other in situations not involving work, thus I never buy them as a crew.

I keep telling myself this is the last episode I will watch but the whole thing is like a terrible car crash that you can’t look away from. The fact that it’s only available to watch one episode a week helps I guess because I’d never manage to binge through it all at once. As a weekly bitter pill to swallow it’s just about manageable.

Wow...not asking rhetorically or trying to bait but I am genuinely curious...I personally find that it sometimes feels that there are not enough hours in the day to do the things that I really love to do...time with my wife and kids, getting into hobbies that I enjoy...even spending two hours watching a movie...I sincerely cannot understand why anyone would CHOOSE to spend an hour a week doing something that they apparently hate...why not spend that time with something that you enjoy?
 
Actually, since TNG, DS9 etc had realistic, immersive holographic technology yet still used viewscreens, methinks they’ve opened a can of worms.

They should have come up with another explanation, like signal strength, power usage or whatever. Or just left it alone.
 
Actually, since TNG, DS9 etc had realistic, immersive holographic technology yet still used viewscreens, methinks they’ve opened a can of worms.

They should have come up with another explanation, like signal strength, power usage or whatever. Or just left it alone.
Leave it alone. Since no matter what they say, someone will complain. So mind as well just do it. Trek fans love to argue and complain. Is a Culture [emoji23]

Sent from my SM-N9600 using Tapatalk
 
Actually, since TNG, DS9 etc had realistic, immersive holographic technology yet still used viewscreens, methinks they’ve opened a can of worms.

They should have come up with another explanation, like signal strength, power usage or whatever. Or just left it alone.

I try not to think about the fact that in season 5 of DS9 they unveiled Holographic Communicators and described them as "new" technology throughout he epsiode as it is installed on the Defiant and by then it is already 100 years later than Discovery...better not to think about it...
 
I found this to be a weak episode. Some good bits, but lots of awkward and outright cringey dialogue. On to next week.
 
Wow...not asking rhetorically or trying to bait but I am genuinely curious...I personally find that it sometimes feels that there are not enough hours in the day to do the things that I really love to do...time with my wife and kids, getting into hobbies that I enjoy...even spending two hours watching a movie...I sincerely cannot understand why anyone would CHOOSE to spend an hour a week doing something that they apparently hate...why not spend that time with something that you enjoy?

Well I’m a Star Trek fan, so I guess I keep tuning in in hopes that this will get better. I don’t want to hate this show, it’s just not working for me.
 
Back
Top