- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
- Messages
- 27,516
- Reaction score
- 3,233
TDK gets my vote too, but is INCREDIBLY close.
Oh that and I enjoyed the score more than TDK's.
TDK by a long margin for me, Batman begins was a good but TDK was epic!
I like them both almost equally for different reasons. BB paints a more
intimate portrait of Batman, plus Ra's happens to be one of my favorite
Batman villains and Neeson was suave in the role. TDK is a beautiful
film in its own right there are just no words to describe how Ledger made
that film so edgy. For me comparing the two is like comparing the Godfather I
with Godfather 2, both are just phenomenal and great on their own merits.
Too hard to say. I actually think in a few years, I'll favor begins. It has too many of those moments I get pumped over. The scene when Bruce discovers the batcave, the bats swirl around him, he stands up and knows what he must become. The way that scene plays with the pulsing music. Just perfect. Then you have the first appearance of Batman, taking the goons out at the docks. Nolan turned it into a fricking scary/suspense film for criminals!
I could go on but right now I can't vote because they are a tie to me. Begins was the perfect origin story for my favorite comic book character. TDK was huge in scope and had broader themes. It got conversations started on the nature of heroes. Just too hard to decide.
frankly i think TDK is way over-rated. now let me clarify that statement.
i love TDk and think it is a very very good film. ledger's performance is legendary. the batpod sequence is awesome. and the script has layers of subtext i'm still discovering upon subsequent viewings.
but let's face it, it IS over-rated. it has some serious problems, not least of which is its insistence on making everything "real". now any movie that has a superhero in it is NEVER going to be totally "real". nolan tried his level best to make it believable why a guy would go around dressed up in a bat costume. and the tone he struck in batman begins was just right. it still had just the right amount of that comic book tonality, as someone here pointed out.
but in tdk, the realism just became overbearing. gotham city had ZERO personality. it just looked and felt like chicago or new york. i'm not asking for giant statues and neon lights everywhere, ala schumacher's gotham. but a tinge of that gothic feel wouldn't have hurt would it?
and tdk's plot was just BLOATED. i'm sure u guys know what i mean.
worst of all for me is that it suffered the same problem ppl were hating spiderman 3 for: rushing thru a major villian's arc in one film. of course, harvey dent's rise and fall is MUCH better handled but they really did not need to have him become 2 face in this film. i felt it would've been much more emotionally impactful if they futher developed his friendship with bruce wayne/batman. then only at the end of tdk, he turns. which would keep the 3rd film wide open for a very juicy (and properly set up) antagonism between hero and villain.
and lastly, i don;t know why ppl give katie holmes so much crap. yeah she's mrs. tom cruise. so what? i think she was absolutely fine in her role. honestly, i don't think maggie gyllenhaal brought any significant improvement performance-wise. in fact her physical presence just took me out of the movie. the whole cast of bb was pretty much intact. when rachel dawes suddenly looks so different, it's jarring. and i felt this role REQUIRED the female love interest to be hot. sorry but maggie with her haggard face just did not do it for me.
sorry for the long-winded rant. but that's my 2 cents'.
gotta comment on that one.but in tdk, the realism just became overbearing. gotham city had ZERO personality. it just looked and felt like chicago or new york. i'm not asking for giant statues and neon lights everywhere, ala schumacher's gotham. but a tinge of that gothic feel wouldn't have hurt would it?