InArt: The Lord of the Rings - Gandalf 1:6

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

Joined
May 7, 2013
Messages
9,198
Reaction score
7,753
People should definitely send messages to inart via facebook saying that the eyes on all of their figures are set too deeply. I'd prefer normal sculpted eyes over these.
I rather they just continue to improve their PERS. Just look at what Hot Toys has been able to achieve with their PERS system, even though it took them until last year to finally achieve it. INART is in that early phase where the eyes, or maybe eyelids, are a bit too thick. They can definitely continue to improve in that area instead of resulting to just going with a static painted eye.


Figure looks great even under Justin's ****** lighting setup.
 

Kebron

Super Freak
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
586
Mindblowingly good! I've never seen a figure survive proto to production this well EVER! Can't wait!

......but I will....ordered mine from KGHobby 😬
Ordered mine from Spec Fiction. Considering people who ordered the Joker through them are just now getting them, I guess I'll see mine next year.
 

dantes2501

Super Freak
Joined
Aug 9, 2019
Messages
836
Reaction score
802
Screenshot 2023-09-18 at 18.05.05.png
Screenshot 2023-09-18 at 18.05.57.png
 

Nagoya

Super Freak
CF Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2021
Messages
1,043
Reaction score
1,664
Location
Room 101
I know people here still have a lot of respect for Asmus (and a weird level of gratefulness for them happily taking their money), but… come on

It would have been nice if Justin had the updated re-rooted GtW sculpt to also compare it against the more similar price point.
 

Cocoboloboy

Coco the Cantankerous
CF Supporter
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
18,617
Reaction score
4,389
Location
OK
I’d like to see a side by side with a properly futzed Asmus using the updated sculpt too.

InArt looks tops. The rooting and paint work are spectacular albeit the hair is a bit too poofy in Justine’s pics. Clothing looks awesome.

I still don’t like the derpy look of the PERS on this and I still see more Ian in Asmus sculpt than I do in IA’s although overall IA’s looks far more realistic due to the superior rooting and paint apps.
 

RandomHero

Super Freak
Joined
Jul 25, 2016
Messages
4,759
Reaction score
4,693
Location
New Jersey, USA
I’d like to see a side by side with a properly futzed Asmus using the updated sculpt too.

InArt looks tops. The rooting and paint work are spectacular albeit the hair is a bit too poofy in Justine’s pics. Clothing looks awesome.

I still don’t like the derpy look of the PERS on this and I still see more Ian in Asmus sculpt than I do in IA’s although overall IA’s looks far more realistic due to the superior rooting and paint apps.
Are you planning on doing any Middle Earth inspired bases for these (or any other LOTR) figures?

And I agree, the PERS eyes definitely not help any of these figures. I understand people like them to avoid the deadstare we get with so many figures but I don't think we're at the point that these eyeballs are truly advancing the hobby. Not yet anyway.
 

chrisstbh

Super Freak
Joined
Jul 29, 2015
Messages
12,975
Reaction score
12,163
Location
Scotland
I'd like to see the Asmus sculpt in the trash can :D Seriously, the quality drop from their prototype to that monstrosity they released, it's just inexcusable.
Honestly I’m not sure how they got away with it, it’s basically a scam when you compare the final product to the prototype.
 

Cazza

Freakalicious
Joined
Sep 18, 2022
Messages
35
Reaction score
18
Location
United Kingdom
There's people in the comments of Justin video saying they prefer Asmus version, I have the Asmus version in front of me, are they trolling or am I missing something. Genuine question haven't collected long the difference in quality to my eyes is huge, or maybe I'm needing new prescription
 

Cocoboloboy

Coco the Cantankerous
CF Supporter
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
18,617
Reaction score
4,389
Location
OK
Are you planning on doing any Middle Earth inspired bases for these (or any other LOTR) figures?

And I agree, the PERS eyes definitely not help any of these figures. I understand people like them to avoid the deadstare we get with so many figures but I don't think we're at the point that these eyeballs are truly advancing the hobby. Not yet anyway.
I like what HT are doing with their SRE system a lot. So far the most recent figures shown with it look amazing, especially Sabine. The old PERS I can definitely do without.

As far as stands go, yes, Middle Earth displays will be available. I made them years ago for all the Asmus, SS and other 1/6 stuff that came out so I’ll for sure continue that.

I have a center post mount I use for ANH Leia that doesn’t poof her dress out in the back and is completely hidden that I think will work great for Gandalf due to his long robes.
 

chrisstbh

Super Freak
Joined
Jul 29, 2015
Messages
12,975
Reaction score
12,163
Location
Scotland
There's people in the comments of Justin video saying they prefer Asmus version, I have the Asmus version in front of me, are they trolling or am I missing something. Genuine question haven't collected long the difference in quality to my eyes is huge, or maybe I'm needing new prescription
They need to convince themselves that they didn’t waste their money.
 

Hando

Super Freak
Joined
Jun 27, 2021
Messages
2,177
Reaction score
2,793
I don't get the love for the seperate moving eyes, I hate them on Hot Toys figures. It's so clunky and time consuming trying to get both eyes to sit right.
You rather have cross eyes that you cant fix at all? Its always a good thing to have more control. Anyway these figures should be given the time to futz.
 
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
21,666
Reaction score
6,202
Location
TX
I'd rather separate eyes than take the risk of PERS that arrive wonky from the factory. That's the main issue for me.

One InArt Joker sculpt arrived fine and the other was a little wonky, and there's nothing that can be done other than remove the mechanism so that they're separate joysticks. Range of motion seems to be better when separate too. In most cases I'd rather they just be painted though.
Same. The individual eyes aren't hard to align either in my experience. Like futzing any other part of the figure, it takes patience to get right but once you do, your figure can look pretty amazing. However, for some folks who prefer to just take their figure out of the box and plop them on a stand without any sort of adjusting the way you see some figures being sold on eBay, I guess can see the frustration with having to put a little effort into the display.

I'm considering picking up other HT sculpts that have singular moveable eyes just so I can take out the InArt system and replace them with the HT ones. The only thing stopping me is that it's a pricey endeavor that don't feel like spending the required money on at the moment :thud:

You rather have cross eyes that you cant fix at all? Its always a good thing to have more control. Anyway these figures should be given the time to futz.
Agreed! Given how much we pay for these things, I don't see why it's too much to ask to put them together with a little time and care.
 
Last edited:

FlyAndFight

©Fly, All rights reserved
CF Supporter
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
17,905
Reaction score
5,940
Location
Minas Miami
To me, InArt's set is amazing. Loving the light-up staff and the amazingly detailed paint apps, not only on the head sculpt but even the hands.

As far as comparing head sculpts, there is absolutely no doubt to me that InArt's is better painted and in particular, has the better hair/beard setup.

But...

While InArt's sculpt makes for a fantastic Gandalf, I feel that Asmus's sculpt captures Ian McKellen better.
 
Top