in the years 1931-1954 lack of technology showed the Universal Monster Films in black and white.
Not
quite true. Three-strip Technicolor was available for years prior to the filming of the Creature films. It was more budgetary concerns that prevented them from using it than technical ones. Plus, Eastman color was available in 1952, which would likely have made it accessible to the filmmakers, had they really wanted to use it.
If we were present on set back in the day, the Creature would have been GREEN and Julie Adams would've had red lipstick and flesh toned skin, not a greyed out black and white.
that's all i'm saying. The SSE are iconic because that's how you've seen them, for me COLOR are more iconic because it's how they were supposed to be seen ... in color.
"If we were present on set back in the day"? That seems like an odd reasoning. We
weren't present on set, so there is no emotional attachment to such imagined memories.
As far has how the Universal monsters were "supposed" to be seen, see my comments above. Color filming techniques were available to the filmmakers. The fact that they chose to film in black and white is reason enough for me to conclude that they were supposed to be seen that way.
SSE are a clever marketing tactic Sideshow has employed to sell more statues.
I suppose that is, in part, true (but no more or less so than it is for any other product Sideshow sells). However, if no one liked them they would not sell, and the tactic would fail.
What baffles me is why you feel such an odd compulsion to continue to try to belittle people who like the SSEs. You don't like them. We get that. We got it the first time you posted comments to that effect. Repeating the same comments, ad nauseam, really serves no purpose other than to aggravate people.
