Call of Duty: Black Ops

[kazukijun]

That's tenative, you think so. I'd take a dual analog over a mouse and keyboard any day. PC aren't for games, consoles are.



Don't judge all COD games on modern turdfare 2.

Clearly, you don't know what you are missing out on...oh well, your loss. Oh yah...that's why you need auto-aim or aim assist to help you.

 

[Starkiller]

Clearly, you don't know what you are missing out on...oh well, your loss. Oh yah...that's why you need auto-aim or aim assist to help you.

You need a mouse to get headshots? LOLz.

 

[kazukijun]

You need a mouse to get headshots? LOLz.

Whatever, I'm not gonna waste any more time debating with you.

In case you've forgotten, the COD series started out as a PC game, without it's success on PC, you won't even have a chance to play it on a console.

 

[VASith]

That's tenative, you think so. I'd take a dual analog over a mouse and keyboard any day. PC aren't for games, consoles are.



Don't judge all COD games on modern turdfare 2.

Actually all of the modern COD games have killstreaks. If a developer has to add all these bells and whistles to a shooter than you know they are overcompensating for something. COD is a game that takes no skill whatsoever to be good at. Between the kids glitching with tactical insertion to the immature people with d*cks on their guns; the COD games are made for the younger kids who aren't into serious shooters. I've said this before and I'll say it again, I've come across much more mature players on BF2 compared to any COD game. All you hear on COD mics are kids getting yelled at by their moms, being called a nP*gger, or hearing "your mom jokes."

 

[Starkiller]

Actually all of the modern COD games have killstreaks. If a developer has to add all these bells and whistles to a shooter than you know they are overcompensating for something. COD is a game that takes no skill whatsoever to be good at. Between the kids glitching with tactical insertion to the immature people with d*cks on their guns; the COD games are made for the younger kids who aren't into serious shooters. I've said this before and I'll say it again, I've come across much more mature players on BF2 compared to any COD game. All you hear on COD mics are kids getting yelled at by their moms, being called a nP*gger, or hearing "your mom jokes."

Yes BUT MW2 was the only game were killstreak reward kills got out of hand and those kills counting towards more killstreaks just ruined the game. The basic 3, 5, 7 was amazing. They went all crazy and added nukes and gunships and just ruined it.

• I have played multiple CODs and they do take skill, take it from me. I've whooped ass and have had my ass whooped. I've seen people jump into games and suck. You can't just jump in and expect to be good against the highest of skilled players in any game.

•Every game has glitches, there are easy ways to kill people people that are using cheap tactics. If you're good enough and skilled enough these players won't even frustrate you.

•No shooter is made for younger kids, they shouldn't be playing them.

•Not sure how many online games you've played but every game has immature idiots and young kids playing it. BF2 is no exception to the rule.

I'd rather deal with your preconceived notion of "immature cod players that take no skill" than sit through one round of an inferior game, BF2 for instance. Your bias towards any COD game is quite sad. You can sit on your imaginary high horse and claim how superior BF2 is in terms of gameplay and players, but at the end of the day it's all BS. You and your BF buddies can hate on COD because you think it's cool or because simply you're not good.

 

[VASith]

Yes BUT MW2 was the only game were killstreak reward kills got out of hand and those kills counting towards more killstreaks just ruined the game. The basic 3, 5, 7 was amazing. They went all crazy and added nukes and gunships and just ruined it.

• I have played multiple CODs and they do take skill, take it from me. I've whooped ass and have had my ass whooped. I've seen people jump into games and suck. You can't just jump in and expect to be good against the highest of skilled players in any game.

•Every game has glitches, there are easy ways to kill people people that are using cheap tactics. If you're good enough and skilled enough these players won't even frustrate you.

•No shooter is made for younger kids, they shouldn't be playing them.

•Not sure how many online games you've played but every game has immature idiots and young kids playing it. BF2 is no exception to the rule.

I'd rather deal with your preconceived notion of "immature cod players that take no skill" than sit through one round of an inferior game, BF2 for instance. Your bias towards any COD game is quite sad. You can sit on your imaginary high horse and claim how superior BF2 is in terms of gameplay and players, but at the end of the day it's all BS. You and your BF buddies can hate on COD because you think it's cool or because simply you're not good.

I was quite good at all of the CODs. Not the best, but far from the worst. I still maintain that BF2 is a better game cause it relies on real teamwork in order to win. And in BF2 you have to earn all of your kills. There is no chopper gunner or napalm strike or nuke. Every kill you get you do yourself..and I think that takes much more skill. I'm glad you enjoy COD but I still believe that winning in BF2 is much more rewarding.

 

[The Josh]

I was quite good at all of the CODs. Not the best, but far from the worst. I still maintain that BF2 is a better game cause it relies on real teamwork in order to win. And in BF2 you have to earn all of your kills. There is no chopper gunner or napalm strike or nuke. Every kill you get you do yourself..and I think that takes much more skill. I'm glad you enjoy COD but I still believe that winning in BF2 is much more rewarding.

BC2 blows COD out of the water and into the next century. In BC2 as you said you have to actually be able to shoot and kill your opponents, use team work and be good at the game. COD is a laggers dream come true and a campers delight.

 

[Starkiller]

Haters gonna hate.

 

[Macularius]

Why not?

PC has better graphics and better controls for FPS. Nothing beats mouse n keyboard controls when it comes to FPS.

Or are you one of those that just uses their PC for porn?

A PS3 with a good quality TV (like many have) can reproduce visuals that are just as good as a PC's visuals, and sometimes PC's aren't fast enough to have games on any settings other than "lowest resolution".

And yes

 

[Macularius]

Actually all of the modern COD games have killstreaks. If a developer has to add all these bells and whistles to a shooter than you know they are overcompensating for something. COD is a game that takes no skill whatsoever to be good at. Between the kids glitching with tactical insertion to the immature people with d*cks on their guns; the COD games are made for the younger kids who aren't into serious shooters. I've said this before and I'll say it again, I've come across much more mature players on BF2 compared to any COD game. All you hear on COD mics are kids getting yelled at by their moms, being called a nP*gger, or hearing "your mom jokes."

Stop talking about Camp of Duty: Modern Killstreak 2. Nobody really likes that game anymore....

Black ops has killstreaks that don't add to your current killstreak; for example, if you get a chopper gunner and get 20 kills with it you won't be at a 29 killstreak when it eventually goes away, but you will still be back at 9. To get high streaks you actually have to shoot people with your own gun, your killstreak rewards don't add to your current streak.

And there's the "mute" feature for a reason

 

[VASith]

Stop talking about Camp of Duty: Modern Killstreak 2. Nobody really likes that game anymore....

Black ops has killstreaks that don't add to your current killstreak; for example, if you get a chopper gunner and get 20 kills with it you won't be at a 29 killstreak when it eventually goes away, but you will still be back at 9. To get high streaks you actually have to shoot people with your own gun, your killstreak rewards don't add to your current streak.

And there's the "mute" feature for a reason

They might not count towards a kill streak but they count in your final kill count. So when someone brags they went 40-1 and got 30 of those kills from a chopper gunner, they didnt shoot those 30 people themselves.

Here's a simple test..jump into any COD and count the number of people camping. Then jump into any BF2 game and count the number of people camping. I guarantee you that COD will have more campers every single time.

 

[Starkiller]

They might not count towards a kill streak but they count in your final kill count. So when someone brags they went 40-1 and got 30 of those kills from a chopper gunner, they didnt shoot those 30 people themselves.

Here's a simple test..jump into any COD and count the number of people camping. Then jump into any BF2 game and count the number of people camping. I guarantee you that COD will have more campers every single time.

Shows how much you know, the player controls the chopper gunner killstreak not the computer. STFU.

Every online shooters has campers in it, is sniping camping? Yes, but with a sniper rifle in hand, you don't move and sit in a corner. Especially in games where you have one life, what's more successful running around the map like an idiot, or staying hidden. Dumb.

 

[VASith]

Shows how much you know, the player controls the chopper gunner killstreak not the computer. STFU.

Every online shooters has campers in it, is sniping camping? Yes, but with a sniper rifle in hand, you don't move and sit in a corner. Especially in games where you have one life, what's more successful running around the map like an idiot, or staying hidden. Dumb.

I was trying to have a civil debate about two very different games. It seems you are unable to do that with the "shut the _____ up" thing. You are way too emotional about your COD games if you have to tell people that. It's clear that it's pointless being civil, so I'll bow out of this discussion.

 

[Starkiller]

Fine by me. I'm passionate about those series I enjoy, and when people not only don't appreciate them but totally generalize those who play it and how it's played.

If you don't like the series, your lost, but don't come in the COD thread expecting to win a debate about how you think COD iz r the suxxorz!

 

[NASEDO]

The camping in Black Ops is not that bad, the maps r small and spyplanes and blackbirds find the campers. But lag is the real problem. Trying playing with a few friends. Some people can not join the lobby etc. Its horrible. Plus the cheating is getting popular.

Socom 4 is almost here. Socom 2 was one of the best shooters ever. But I doubt 4 we'll live up.

 

[Starkiller]

The camping in Black Ops is not that bad, the maps r small and spyplanes and blackbirds find the campers. But lag is the real problem. Trying playing with a few friends. Some people can not join the lobby etc. Its horrible. Plus the cheating is getting popular.

Socom 4 is almost here. Socom 2 was one of the best shooters ever. But I doubt 4 we'll live up.

I've never had a problem with lag. But when is cheating not popular? Between W@W and MW2 I switched over to the 360 because after I got my new job all my work friends gamed on it. And all my old college buddies had a PS3. So maybe the lag is more of a PS3 issue.


Wasn't a fan of the socom 4 beta, reminded me of MGS online. Kind of clunky I guess.

 

[slipknotpredator]

Im about to buy this game, im not fully onto first person shooters, but how this one compares to Modern warfare II ? Is it better?

 

[snappahead]

I've never had a problem with lag. But when is cheating not popular? Between W@W and MW2 I switched over to the 360 because after I got my new job all my work friends gamed on it. And all my old college buddies had a PS3. So maybe the lag is more of a PS3 issue.


Wasn't a fan of the socom 4 beta, reminded me of MGS online. Kind of clunky I guess.

Everybody lags...you just don't notice it. Lag isn't just stuttering around and teleporting.

My one and only beef with BO is the spotty hit detection. I'm an average player will be the first to admit when I've missed a dude, but there's a ton of times when I'm dead on and nothing..or one hit marker out of 15 bullets. It can create very screwy kills too, so it's not just getting ripped off. MW2 has the same issues, but they don't seem nearly as bad.

 

[Starkiller]

Im about to buy this game, im not fully onto first person shooters, but how this one compares to Modern warfare II ? Is it better?

Much better than MW2, I like the story and settings more and the online is more balanced in terms of gameplay and maps.

Everybody lags...you just don't notice it. Lag isn't just stuttering around and teleporting.

My one and only beef with BO is the spotty hit detection. I'm an average player will be the first to admit when I've missed a dude, but there's a ton of times when I'm dead on and nothing..or one hit marker out of 15 bullets. It can create very screwy kills too, so it's not just getting ripped off. MW2 has the same issues, but they don't seem nearly as bad.

I experience that with every game with the dreaded I killed a guy a split second before he killed me, so how did he kill me if he was already dead...lagggg.

 

[snappahead]

Much better than MW2, I like the story and settings more and the online is more balanced in terms of gameplay and maps.




I experience that with every game with the dreaded I killed a guy a split second before he killed me, so how did he kill me if he was already dead...lagggg.

There is that at times, but I'm talking about the hit detection. This game has real issues with that. No game has got it perfect yet and might never get it perfect, but BO has the most inconsistent hit detection I've probably ever dealt with. Some games, I'm smoking guys even when I'm missing and other games, I can't seem to even get hit markers. The last game to be this iffy was WaW. Can't be a coincidence.