lcummins
Universal MODster
Re: The Avengers: Discussion Thread
I always liked Mrs. Peel the best... oh wait... wrong Avengers... nevermind...![Big grin :D :D]()
![TheAvengers60s.jpg](https://proxy.imagearchive.com/482/4827acf5f8c5ff18c8e71bc1000a3068.jpg)
I always liked Mrs. Peel the best... oh wait... wrong Avengers... nevermind...
They could do full Hulk or have Banner in the shadows never talking, never really seen. There are ways around having Norton in it but most fans probably want him there, myself included.
And Whedon has directed exactly one film, and that was SERENITY.
Once MOTHERLESS BROOKLYN is released soon, Edward Norton himself would have directed more movies than Lord Whedon.
They could do full Hulk or have Banner in the shadows never talking, never really seen. There are ways around having Norton in it but most fans probably want him there, myself included.
![]()
Seems like he could be in the Avengers as a minor Avenger or Shield member.
Is Power Man Luke Cage?
Who the ____ is Iron Fist?
Hey Marvel, save the money your gonna spend on Ant Man, Iron Fist, or whatever other Abercrombie thing your doing and give Norton whatever he asks for the Avengers ok? Thanks alot.
Say what now? I would MUCH prefer Ant Man and Iron Fist be in the movie then worry about Norton as Bruce Banner! More Any Man then Iron Fist, but still...
Norton is a great actor, but I wouldnt say he NAILED Bruce Banner. Robert Downey Jr NAILED Tony Stark. Christopher Reeves NAILED Superman/Clark Kent, Christian Bale NAILED Bruce Wayne. Hugh Jackman NAILED wolverine. Patrick Stewert NAILED proffessor X, Heath Ledger NAILED the Joker.
I wont forever think of Bruce Banner as Ed Norton, or vica versa. So why spend the bucks on an actor that doesnt really bring anything special to the character?![]()
Enter your email address to join: