nicky
Super Freak
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
- Messages
- 2,117
- Reaction score
- 5
Taking a break from the usual monster vs monster poll (or even hard-man vs hard-man) I'm challenging you with something different. These two women are both equally feminist icons in cinematic sci-fi action given to us by James Cameron.
Both are bitter fighters and mothers suffering from loss at the hands of their non-human enemy and have tooled up in a bid to save mankind. One has had training though the other has been through more dangerous scenarios and had to work almost alone and take charge.
I'm specifically talking about T2 Sarah and Aliens/Alien 3 Ripley (BEFORE she was cloned into a superhuman-hybrid). And no "depends-if she's-programmed-to-target-the-enemy" type sh1t either, they're not Terminators and no "depends-on-how-big-their-gun-is" bolloks either.
I think Conner is physically better and is more pissed off but Ripley wins in the brains, leadership and ingenuity round plus she has bigger balls.
Both are bitter fighters and mothers suffering from loss at the hands of their non-human enemy and have tooled up in a bid to save mankind. One has had training though the other has been through more dangerous scenarios and had to work almost alone and take charge.
I'm specifically talking about T2 Sarah and Aliens/Alien 3 Ripley (BEFORE she was cloned into a superhuman-hybrid). And no "depends-if she's-programmed-to-target-the-enemy" type sh1t either, they're not Terminators and no "depends-on-how-big-their-gun-is" bolloks either.
I think Conner is physically better and is more pissed off but Ripley wins in the brains, leadership and ingenuity round plus she has bigger balls.
Last edited: