Official Transformer Movie Review Thread!!! - Spoiler Free until July 4th!

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
dekadentdave said:
Douglas likes to argue for the sake of arguing.:lol FYI buddy I didn't write that poem, it was written by someone very high up on the production of the film who worked closely with Bay and posted it at the movie wrap party to express his disatisfaction with Bay's so-called "vision."

It's actually called debating ... people only seem to call it arguing when they can't debate the points, but I digress.

I never said that you wrote it. However, no matter who pinned it, I highly doubt any of the rest of us wanted to have to look at it a second time. The majority of us already accepted that Bay is probably a huge A$$hat. Doesn't change the fact that most of us loved Transformers and you did not. Also, doesn't change the fact that many people enjoy Bay's movies and you do not. So, if you want to debate the myriad of points I have posted previously, let me know. Otherwise, I guess we are done here.
 
DouglasMcc said:
It's actually called debating ... people only seem to call it arguing when they can't debate the points, but I digress.

I never said that you wrote it. However, no matter who pinned it, I highly doubt any of the rest of us wanted to have to look at it a second time. The majority of us already accepted that Bay is probably a huge A$$hat. Doesn't change the fact that most of us loved Transformers and you did not. Also, doesn't change the fact that many people enjoy Bay's movies and you do not. So, if you want to debate the myriad of points I have posted previously, let me know. Otherwise, I guess we are done here.
I don't know if he will debate them, but I bet he will argue them with you.:monkey5
 
DouglasMcc said:
It's actually called debating ... people only seem to call it arguing when they can't debate the points, but I digress.

I never said that you wrote it. However, no matter who pinned it, I highly doubt any of the rest of us wanted to have to look at it a second time. The majority of us already accepted that Bay is probably a huge A$$hat. Doesn't change the fact that most of us loved Transformers and you did not. Also, doesn't change the fact that many people enjoy Bay's movies and you do not. So, if you want to debate the myriad of points I have posted previously, let me know. Otherwise, I guess we are done here.

Well said Douglas. Your argument came off sound and well constructed, without coming off to brash and insulting. Other then the part were you call Michael Bay an asshat. It sounds like Dave just wants to persuade those of us into thinking we were fooled into believing this movie was good. Sorry Dave, it's just not going to happen. You can complain how far fetched and silly the movie is and why those of us find this movie entertaining, boggles your mind to no end, however, the end result will remain the same. You have your opinion and we have our's. The great thing about having an opinion, is that it's your's. The not-so-great thing about having an opinion is not everyone is going to agree with it. Constantly replaying this old track won't change matters. Instead, it just makes for repetitive tedious discussion. I have been at fault for this in the past, but I too have a hard time fathoming as to why certain individuals like certain films. Through time I have tried to accept the fact not everyone shares my views or opinions.

Transformers the movie was never meant to be more than just brain dead frivolous good fun. After all, you need to look no further than the source material it's based upon. Those cartoons were so mediocre in hindsight, it was laughable. Yet to a degree they were also very entertaining, just as long as you could ignore all the animatical (yes I made up the word) errors and gaping plot holes. Or how certain characters were introduced into the series from out of thin air with no logical explanation, other than they were just there. They would often leave the same way. I accepted that the Transformers movie would follow suit, based on the simple premise that the character names are silly for starters, and of course the bigger thing being, that we have big gigantic alien organic robots that take on the shape and form of man made machinery like land driven vehicles, jets, right down to small electronic devises such as cell phones and boomboxes. Then to top it off, they have to speak coherent english! The whole idea of that kind of world is absurd. Based on that thought alone, I fail to see how anyone could have taken on this project and done a much better job than Mr. Bay and company. How can you make that kind of world seem serious and believable? You can't. In all honesty, I am okay with that, because for the most part I felt this movie still stayed faithful to the source material. Yet at the same time it provided us with enhanced visuals we have never seen before, and some immature, yet funny at times, comedic moments.

I prefer films that are packaged with intelligent dialogue, exuberant acting and story telling. Thus why my favorite all-time movie is appropriately, the ShawShank Redemption. Recent favorites have come in the shape or form of movies like Gangs of New York, Frequency, the Whale Rider, City of God, and the Fastest Indian, just to name a few.

But that put all aside, I came into the Transformers movie as a long-time fan of its original 1980's Saturday morning cartoon counterpart, and the toyline that it was made around. I came in with wide open eyes that it would be what it was. No Oscar worthy movie. Just 149 minutes of orgasmic joy! All it takes is watching one episode of the original Generation 1 series and you're reminded just how close the two are to eachother.

I am not asking that you change your mind into liking this movie. More-or-less, just giving you my perspective as to why I enjoyed it.

Get this, I absolutely detested Independence Day yet absolutely loved this movie. Perhaps my childhood clouds my judgement and has made be a bit biased, but I would gladly accept ass kicking robots that turn into recognizable things we use every day over aliens in huge burnt pancake shaped flying saucers decimating cities. The reason I bring ID4 up is because there are a lot of familiarities to it when put up against Michael Bay's Transformers.

That's my opinion anyway.
 
Last edited:
Hey ... I figured Dave would have loved Independence Day ... I mean come on, Steve Job's Mac saved Mankind ..... :rotfl

Sorry, sorry, couldn't resist.

But, back to the point at hand. There are always little things in movies that defy logic:

The Mac which can interface an alien computer with no modification in ID4.
John McClane and the Fighter Jet sequence in LFoDH.
The fact that they didn't build some kind of actual Cryogenic Chamber for Megatron in Transformers - come on - just leave him out in the open and flash freeze him? That's bright.
Every single instance in modern cinema of a person or animal outrunning an explosion/ ball of flames.
Superman 2's Plastic Wrap emblem and forget me not kiss (thankful the new cut fixed these).
Every instance of a person running upstairs in a horror movie.
Jason's walking stride always catching up to a fully running teen in Friday 13th movies.
Every damn instance of a criminal or villain talking and mocking the hero ... giving them time to come up with a plan ... when shooting them right away removes the problem - this also applies to all the old Bond death traps as well.
The fact that England would waste all that money to brainwash Alex and other criminal deviants in A Clockwork Orange, when a simple bullet to the back of the head would have taken care of the problem and been in line with their totalitarian society.

The list goes on and on ... but the point being, in order to enjoy most literature, cinema, etc. now-a-days, you have to be willing to approach it with a certain level of suspension of disbelief. My main caveat with people complaining about parts of Transformers is that if you can accept that Autonomous Biological giant robots exists ... how can any of the other gaps in logic be that bad? Accepting that the Autobots and Decepticons exist is the hard part ... once you do that, the rest is pure entertainment.

Once again, not trying to change anyone's opinion of the movie. I just get irritated when people claim A and B in movie C make it unrealistic, when 90% of the movies we watch are unrealistic.
 
Give it up Douglas. Independence Day is a piece of crap brought to you by one of the biggest f'n hacks on the planet: Roland Emmerich. He is a plagiarist who has ripped off more successful films than any other director: Universal Soldier: Terminator, Stargate: Raiders of the Lost Ark/Star Wars, Independence Day: Star Wars/Close Enounters/War of the Worlds/E.T./Top Gun, Godzilla: Jurassic Park, Moon 44: Alien

How this guy AND Michael Bay AND Brett Ratner continue to make films is astonishing.
 
I hate "ID4: Independace Day". In fact, the elements of "Transformers" that bothered me the most were all things that reminded me of that piece of crap. For example, the whole secret underground goverment facility where citizens-- including comic relief minorities-- are magically allowed instant access simply because of the global "crisis". And all of sudden the characters all know EVERYTHING. I was half expecting Jon Voight to jump in a jet and face-off with Megatron. Not that the scene with him, Tuturro, Funny Black Man #2 and the Brit Stripper Turned NSA Advisor facing off against Frenzy wasn't bad enough. :rolleyes:

Meh. Just give me more of the giant f'in robots pummeling each other. :monkey5

Still, all that said above, I am ultimately in the "it rocks!" camp. :rock
 
Give me $200 million dollars and I'll make a Transformers movie the way it should have been. First, all G1 Transformers would retain their original designs, secondly all original voice cast would do the voices with the exception of Scatman Cruthers (Jazz) and Chris Latta (Starscream) who are now deceased. Read my lips: NO LIPS ON PRIME!!! Also I would open the movie with the epic battle between the Autobots and Decepticons on Cybertron and there would be more focus on the robot characters and less on the humans, and comic relief would be used sparringly and only when appropriate, the reciprocal of Bay's misfire.
 
I actually don't mind the redesigns too much. I think they work visually and viscerally, particularly Prime and Bumblebee.

However, the film DID make the age-old Hollywood mistake of placing too much emphasis and screentime on one-dimensional human characters portrayed with, at best, pedestrian performances. Now, Shia was great (you were dead-on, Dusty)... and Megan Fox was fine (in more ways than one). But the rest? Blech.

Seriously, who would disagree with me that the 15 seconds of Prime vs Bonecrusher is 100x better than any of the human "drama" in the movie COMBINED?

Item #1 on the sequel list: More ROBOTS. (Much) less Humans.

Heck, I could watch 2 hours of JUST the robots! The problem is, Hollywood will never get that. They're too mired in rehashed formula and superficial demographics charts. :rolleyes:
 
good discussion everybody.

i think another reason we won't ever get 2 hours of just robots on robots (on top of the reasons given above) is simply the cost it would be to do that. they were talking about it taking 38 hrs to render 1 FRAME of a transformation. With 26ish frames per second, and 2-3 seconds per transformation, that is 82-124 days of rendering time per transformation! i can't imagine how many computers they would need to handle that kind of power. THAT'S expensive...

quite frankly, i'm amazed that Michael Bay was able to show us as much as he did for only 150 million dollars, considering Spiderman 3 and Pirates 3 were both well over 250 million each.

my two cents!
 
If Pixar can make full length CGI animated movies, there's no excuse why Dreamworks and ILM can't.
 
dekadentdave said:
Give me $200 million dollars and I'll make a Transformers movie the way it should have been. First, all G1 Transformers would retain their original designs, secondly all original voice cast would do the voices with the exception of Scatman Cruthers (Jazz) and Chris Latta (Starscream) who are now deceased. Read my lips: NO LIPS ON PRIME!!! Also I would open the movie with the epic battle between the Autobots and Decepticons on Cybertron and there would be more focus on the robot characters and less on the humans, and comic relief would be used sparringly and only when appropriate, the reciprocal of Bay's misfire.

First off, you would only get 150 million. The producers had to beg and plead to get that much in the first place. Second, you would blow half that on your Cybertron introduction. Third, you would have to have the robots land on earth in the 1980's - otherwise they wouldn't be "robots in disguise" - since their outdated vehicle designs/mimics would have given them away in a heart beat.

Plus, do you really think a modern teenage/ pre-teen audience would accept these as battle-hardened robots in today's day and age:

685px-Bumblebee-boxart.jpg
484px-Bonecrusher-boxart.jpg


240px-Frenzy-boxart.jpg
373px-Barricade-g1.jpg


Mtmte1-43.jpg
Jazz_profile.jpg


The only 2 G1 Transformers that hold up are Megatron and Prime. And there is NO way Hasbro would have allowed any director to make Megatron into a gun, because it would have killed the tie-in toys for him (bit#h all you want, but merchandising is just important as the film with a property like this). And while the changes to Prime were unnecessary, they also didn't hurt the character.

I think I finally understand where you are coming from Dave. You want a movie aimed at us 30 to 40 year olds, who grew up with the cartoon. I know you don't want to hear this, but that movie would be a bigger bomb than Battlefield Earth in today's market. The kids would reject it, and the few "fanboys" like us who would go see it, probably wouldn't make back the catering bill for the film.

If this movie was going to get made, whether it was you, or Micheal Bay, or friggin' James Cameron, the robots were going to be updated, re-imagined. The film was going to be geared towards capturing a new youth generation. The fact that Bay accomplished that, along with touching homage's to the G1 stuff is impressive. But, I guess that's not enough for you. But, as we have said, that's your opinion and we respect it. Now, how about showing us the same courtesy.
 
dekadentdave said:
If Pixar can make full length CGI animated movies, there's no excuse why Dreamworks and ILM can't.
Yeah... I'm not buying the "CGI is too expensive" excuse, either. We hear the same thing about the JURASSIC PARK flicks and why they can't just showcase more dinosaurs. But then you turn on your TV and there is "Walking With Dinosaurs" on Discovery Channel with hours and hours of photorealistic dinosaurs made on a budget that has to be a fraction of the feature films.

The truth is that Hollywood simply lacks the balls to make movies that don't feature cardboard cut-out human characters. Look at the AVP films as another prime example.
 
If they make a sequel, I hope that Michael Bay includes some stereotypical minorities as comic relief. Not enough of that in the first one, in my opinion.


Also, after the collosal damage at the end, the camera should have panned over to a Native American looking at the devastation with a single tear running down his cheek.
 
damn some people here are the biggest bunch of crybabies ive ever seen.
 
tomandshell said:
If they make a sequel, I hope that Michael Bay includes some stereotypical minorities as comic relief. Not enough of that in the first one, in my opinion.


Also, after the collosal damage at the end, the camera should have panned over to a Native American looking at the devastation with a single tear running down his cheek.

Every single character was stereotypical, not just the minorities - that's Mr. Bay for ya. But hey, if we can't laugh at ourselves, what's the point? Not trying to pick a fight, but what do you think of South Park? :confused:
 
Don't worry--I was being sarcastic!

I am surprised at some of the criticisms this movie is receiving, since I would have thought that people knew what to expect from Michael Bay by now. There wasn't a believable character on the screen and that worked fine for a flick like this.

I actually liked the movie and I'm going to see it again tomorrow with my son.

But this is a funny thread.
 
tomandshell said:
I am surprised at some of the criticisms this movie is receiving, since I would have thought that people knew what to expect from Michael Bay by now.

Oh, so that's makes it okay? Whatever. If you guys want to accept Bay's crap go right ahead. I'm not going to accept a movie that deceives its audience into accepting that it calls itself Transformers when it is really a movie in disguise. :lol
 
Back
Top