I dunno dude, if anything I'd troll on batman way before the hulk. In fact I've given it pretty bad to a few recent figures like catwoman, I give it hard when it's deserved and I praise hard when it's deserved, believe me I'm not giving it hard to hulk that's because as I said from my first post clearly, it's a successful and well done figure in my book.
Let me make this clear.
1. I like the figure. It was made as well as it could be.
2. I find it Boring, it might just be me. I'd pay a little more for a few more parts with options for more diversity.
3. The chest hair paint application is really the only thing I have harsh criticism over.
That's hardly trolling, it's constructive criticism that most would or should agree with (the price point vs. more accessories is subjective and I can see the argument for both) but the paint application on certain areas, specifically the chest hair and especially at that scale I'd find a hard time anyone trying to defend its done up to their calibre. Does it ruin the whole thing? Obviously not but its still not up to par.
But aside from the paint application on the chest I don't have much else to criticize objectively, how I feel about the figure irrespective of that is my prerogative really.
I couldn't resist, especially after reading these posts from people that found this figure so horribly lacking but bought it anyway.
