Sideshow Spider-Man Comiquette (2010)
- Thread starter Isildur's bane
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
risingstar
Super Freak
Re: Spider-Man Comiquette
Can you actually say "too enormously small"?
Is that like saying speeding at a slow pace?
Can you actually say "too enormously small"?
Is that like saying speeding at a slow pace?
Re: Spider-Man Comiquette
What's wrong with that?
Can you actually say "too enormously small"?
Is that like saying speeding at a slow pace?
What's wrong with that?
Re: Spider-Man Comiquette
Based on that pic of his work, I think that is definitely a good thing. This is a great, iconic Spidey head sculpt. A wacky head sculpt would have been a deal breaker for me.
ActionJackson83
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2010
- Messages
- 1,540
- Reaction score
- 18
Re: Spider-Man Comiquette
well screw the PF now, getting this one instead lol...
well screw the PF now, getting this one instead lol...
Raikirik
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2009
- Messages
- 1,955
- Reaction score
- 5
Re: Spider-Man Comiquette
I overlooked the fact the final look of the statue does veer from the artwork quite a bit, especially the way the faces are done. We've already seen that with Venom and Carnage. Both times I had seen the print and the statue at the same time and was able to compare. Not seeing the print this time around kind of threw me off and for some reason other people panicking about this not looking Olivetti-esque worried me.
I was dumb to doubt that this wasn't part of the trio. We'll see the print next week and it will most likely be very Olivetti.
Anyone else think that this one was going to be a PPO? I know Carnage wasn't and I wasn't around at the time for Venom.
I overlooked the fact the final look of the statue does veer from the artwork quite a bit, especially the way the faces are done. We've already seen that with Venom and Carnage. Both times I had seen the print and the statue at the same time and was able to compare. Not seeing the print this time around kind of threw me off and for some reason other people panicking about this not looking Olivetti-esque worried me.
I was dumb to doubt that this wasn't part of the trio. We'll see the print next week and it will most likely be very Olivetti.
Anyone else think that this one was going to be a PPO? I know Carnage wasn't and I wasn't around at the time for Venom.
Re: Spider-Man Comiquette
Well, he's not a roided up freak like most Marvel characters. But he isn't supposed to be. Spidey is a sinewy, lanky contortionist. I guess that makes him "feminine" in relation to someone like the Hulk or Juggernaut. But that's just his look, IMO.
jinxx
Super Freak
Re: Spider-Man Comiquette
Whoa! That's quite a bulge!
Whoa! That's quite a bulge!
Re: Spider-Man Comiquette
Looks way different from the PF to me. It isn't the pose necessarily that I dislike about that one (though the new one is more Spidey-like to me), but the face looks weird and the partially fabric clothes don't work well.
Looks way different from the PF to me. It isn't the pose necessarily that I dislike about that one (though the new one is more Spidey-like to me), but the face looks weird and the partially fabric clothes don't work well.
creature4000
Super Freak
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2006
- Messages
- 9,586
- Reaction score
- 7
Re: Spider-Man Comiquette
this is why I said he almost looks generic. as in not life like, like Venom and Carnage.
Just thought I'd post these together.
this is why I said he almost looks generic. as in not life like, like Venom and Carnage.
NosferatuBill36
Super Freak
Re: Spider-Man Comiquette
To be fair, the symbiotes ARE living creatures...so that's why they SHOULD appear to be "life-like."
Whereas Spidey's suit is spandex, and has a more 'generic' appearance for the fabric.
To be fair, the symbiotes ARE living creatures...so that's why they SHOULD appear to be "life-like."
Whereas Spidey's suit is spandex, and has a more 'generic' appearance for the fabric.
Similar threads
