Which one scene should you skip to improve the movie tenfold ?

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Jar Jars introductory scene (which went on forever) in Phantom Menace. It did nothing but slow the story to a screaching halt.

I heartily agree with your wiggling toe scene from Kill Bill I. :lol
 
I don't get all the hate for Katie Holmes in Batman Begins, she did about as much as could be done with that role.


-Doc Ock's "I will not die a monster" scene in Spider-Man 2 :yuck

-Merry and Pippin lembas bread scene in FOTR extended cut. LOTR doesn't need fart jokes.

-The whole rave sequence, Neo/Trinity love scene, Morpheus speech from Matrix Reloaded. That literally felt like it went on forever.

-The sex scene in Highlander. I want swordfights and decapatations, not cheesy softcore porn.

-The spying scene from Superman Returns. I actually squirmed a bit in my seat at the theater. Very creepy vibe to that one.

-Anakin and Padme discussing the complications of their relationship in AOTC. The dialogue is so atrocious and the delivery of it so stilted and awkward, it's just painful to watch.
 
The scene were Kurgan gets his head chopped off..............








































Like I would have had any other answer:D
 
That stupid song in the 'new' version of ROTJ at Jabba's palace.

Why? Why, George, why?
 
Every single scene that GL added or changes in the OT. I want to see the movie that I loved as a kid.
 
In Se7en, one of my favorite films of all time, there is ONE scene, one LINE,
that just bugs me every time I hear it. When John Doe is taken to the desert
and they step out of the car there is a dead dog carcass there, and he says:
"I didn't do that" It just throws me every time the way he says it. If I could
change it, I'd have him say in an honestly compasionate tone: "poor thing"

It would make a big difference to me, John Doe taking compassion on an animal,
considering his other actions to people in the film.

JS
 
JSAuctionService said:
In Se7en, one of my favorite films of all time, there is ONE scene, one LINE,
that just bugs me every time I hear it. When John Doe is taken to the desert
and they step out of the car there is a dead dog carcass there, and he says:
"I didn't do that" It just throws me every time the way he says it. If I could
change it, I'd have him say in an honestly compasionate tone: "poor thing"

It would make a big difference to me, John Doe taking compassion on an animal, considering his other actions to people in the film.

Thats actually a very good point, and I agree, it would have been in keeping with Doe's character if he had said that.
 
I'm gonna go a little old school but the scene in Caddyshack where Noonan's girlfried tells him she is pregnent... UGH.
 
decadentdave said:
No, it's because I'm SO in love with you.

Good one!

How about everything in ROTS except the Mustafar sequence. :emperor
 
Yeah, most of the Matrix Reloaded and Revolutions, it had too much "Hey, let's make a weird, random, and nonfunctional part here."

Hard to say it, but yeah, there's too much politics in the Star Wars prequels and sometimes I skip that stuff.

Sometimes I skip the first hour and ten minutes of King Kong.
 
As much as I hate Brett Rattner, he managed to use the right actors and the right script to put together a decent film of Thomas Harris' RED DRAGON.

EXCEPT


The very last scene of the movie where Chilton tells Dr. Lecter that there's a girl here to interview him, an out of place ham-handed reference to Clarice Starling in THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS.

RED DRAGON is supposed to be a prequel! In theory new viewers should watch it first and not have a stupid joke at the end of the movie that they wouldn't get! It irks me to no end. It tasks me. It vexes me. Did I mention that I hate this scene?
 
mfoga said:
Every single scene that GL added or changes in the OT. I want to see the movie that I loved as a kid.


OK, here is something I've never understood. Why when George adds to his films, everyone hates it, but when Peter Jackson adds half an hour to his already 3 hour movie, people love it and think its the best thing ever :confused:
 
Are you kidding? I HATED the extended versions of the LOTR trilogy! Watching them is like watching paint dry, and I have painted figures that have dried faster than it takes to watch those!
 
Buttmunch said:
OK, here is something I've never understood. Why when George adds to his films, everyone hates it, but when Peter Jackson adds half an hour to his already 3 hour movie, people love it and think its the best thing ever :confused:


Ah, but both versions are available... so no harm no foul. And I don't think PJ is quite as big a cheeseball as Lucas. Having said that though, I'm dumbfounded by the idea of an extended Kong! :lol
 
Buttmunch said:
OK, here is something I've never understood. Why when George adds to his films, everyone hates it, but when Peter Jackson adds half an hour to his already 3 hour movie, people love it and think its the best thing ever :confused:

Because for the most part the additions are enhancements, i.e. they develop the story or characters more. I can't think of a single example in which the additions (in PJ's case) were a CG booger to a character's uvula! :lol Not to mention he hasn't (yet) been futzing with them since the 70's.
 
LOTRFan said:
Because for the most part the additions are enhancements, i.e. they develop the story or characters more. I can't think of a single example in which the additions (in PJ's case) were a CG booger to a character's uvula! :lol Not to mention he hasn't (yet) been futzing with them since the 70's.

Well, I hate to burst your bubble, but adding a fart joke to the LOTR extended cuts is MUCH worse than any booger could be. True, Lucas changed more, and more often, but the fart wins this contest.

P.S. I can only agree with one movie obmission so far ... the Rave scene in Matrix Reloaded. Now, I get the meaning, showing that humanity is going to keep on living no matter what, but the way the scene is shot sets the wrong tone. I would change its delivery, not the idea.

But I have never understood the concept of "removing a scene" from a beloved film. You have to take the good with the bad with these things. Amazing how many of you crucify Lucas for changing his own movies, when you could fill a couple of seasons of Nip/Tuck with your scalpel jobs. Just one of those things that makes you go .... DOH!
 
Back
Top