Premium Format SSC Harley Quinn

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
You are missing the point of my post, which is that seemingly in these times, we must take even non-sexual subjects, or cute subjects or attractive subjects who are not necessarily Jenna Jameson but still cute and rather sweet - and remind everyone, everywhere at all places and all times that certain female body parts exist and not only that, but that they must be visible AT ALL TIMES.

Meh.
 
You are missing the point of my post, which is that seemingly in these times, we must take even non-sexual subjects, or cute subjects or attractive subjects who are not necessarily Jenna Jameson but still cute and rather sweet - and remind everyone, everywhere at all places and all times that certain female body parts exist and not only that, but that they must be visible AT ALL TIMES.

Meh.

You know, this went up for order awhile back. Not sure why you are feeling the need to blast this piece now that others are getting it in hand. Kind of late in the game to be making suggestions on what you would like to see changed don't you think?
 
Pornification?! What's wrong with people anymore. They are COMIC characters, both male and female characters have exaggerated features/proportions.
 
You are missing the point of my post, which is that seemingly in these times, we must take even non-sexual subjects, or cute subjects or attractive subjects who are not necessarily Jenna Jameson but still cute and rather sweet - and remind everyone, everywhere at all places and all times that certain female body parts exist and not only that, but that they must be visible AT ALL TIMES.

As a female as well, I don't see anything wrong with showing parts of the female body. Nipples don't always need to be something that is sexual in nature - they're just part of the female body - I mean, anything can be sexual: the hourglass curves, a tight butt, etc. It's all a matter of perspective, I guess; I've ordered this piece to put on display and I can't say that it's an issue that bothers me in the slightest. In another light, to shun the female body is just as bad.

That said, we're also talking about a comic book character. ALL female characters in comics tend to be over exaggerated: Power girl, Catwoman, She-Hulk, Spider Woman, Ms. Marvel, Poison Ivy, etc. It doesn't make them any less awesome; most of them use their 'sexuality' to their advantage. It doesn't make them any less amazing then male superheroes.
 
You are missing the point of my post, which is that seemingly in these times, we must take even non-sexual subjects, or cute subjects or attractive subjects who are not necessarily Jenna Jameson but still cute and rather sweet - and remind everyone, everywhere at all places and all times that certain female body parts exist and not only that, but that they must be visible AT ALL TIMES.

Meh.

The Hulk PF's nipples are popping out, but I don't hear you whining about that.
 
I am female and unmoved by such silliness, except to decry the general porn-ification of seemingly every. last. single. thing. in western civilization. Bah. And meh, in equal proportion.

I'll just go buy that Tweeterhead Julie Newmar, blessedly unmarked by this type of crap. She's wearing an 1960s-appropriate pointed bra, just like the real Julie Newmar did, and that is more than sexy enough for me - thanks. Sometimes a whisper is more alluring than a shout.

*waves away pornified Harly*

I think your comment about Western Civilization is the exact reason grown men giggle at the thought of nipples. Western Culture overreacts to the slightest sexual overtone in such a ridiculous fashion that we have people comparing nipples through clothes to porn.
 
Got her a little while ago. No issues.

001-1.jpg


003-1.jpg


004.jpg


007-1.jpg
 
As a female as well, I don't see anything wrong with showing parts of the female body. Nipples don't always need to be something that is sexual in nature - they're just part of the female body - I mean, anything can be sexual: the hourglass curves, a tight butt, etc. It's all a matter of perspective, I guess; I've ordered this piece to put on display and I can't say that it's an issue that bothers me in the slightest. In another light, to shun the female body is just as bad.

That said, we're also talking about a comic book character. ALL female characters in comics tend to be over exaggerated: Power girl, Catwoman, She-Hulk, Spider Woman, Ms. Marvel, Poison Ivy, etc. It doesn't make them any less awesome; most of them use their 'sexuality' to their advantage. It doesn't make them any less amazing then male superheroes.

Yep. Males are just as exagerated in comics as females. The victim card just doesn't work anymore. Being offended by human body parts is immature.
 
Getting mine tomorrow. Way excited for it and the EX head. The eyeshadow looks great.

Glad the nipples are there . . . this worlds too reserved for me, gets worse all the time. And Im in California even. It all roots from that R word that is just "so wrong" to everyone to even be brought up. So I can't mention it on here. Without it they'd be seen as just another body part as they should be. Even full nudity should be looked at as natural. I believe it hurts nothing.

But anyways chicks are drawn hot in comics and the statues should be sculpted to be as hot as possible too. It's for realism. She's not an alien with missing human features. Gotham gets cold at night. ALL female statues from here on out wearing tight tops should have nipple bumps actually.
 
You are missing the point of my post, which is that seemingly in these times, we must take even non-sexual subjects, or cute subjects or attractive subjects who are not necessarily Jenna Jameson but still cute and rather sweet - and remind everyone, everywhere at all places and all times that certain female body parts exist and not only that, but that they must be visible AT ALL TIMES.

Meh.

You know, this went up for order awhile back. Not sure why you are feeling the need to blast this piece now that others are getting it in hand. Kind of late in the game to be making suggestions on what you would like to see changed don't you think?

Pornification?! What's wrong with people anymore. They are COMIC characters, both male and female characters have exaggerated features/proportions.

Pornificate everything sez I.

Honestly, you were kind of slutting it up on your Superman review. Maybe it's you Aussies that are whoring things up. And we trusted you!

As a female as well, I don't see anything wrong with showing parts of the female body. Nipples don't always need to be something that is sexual in nature - they're just part of the female body - I mean, anything can be sexual: the hourglass curves, a tight butt, etc. It's all a matter of perspective, I guess; I've ordered this piece to put on display and I can't say that it's an issue that bothers me in the slightest. In another light, to shun the female body is just as bad.

That said, we're also talking about a comic book character. ALL female characters in comics tend to be over exaggerated: Power girl, Catwoman, She-Hulk, Spider Woman, Ms. Marvel, Poison Ivy, etc. It doesn't make them any less awesome; most of them use their 'sexuality' to their advantage. It doesn't make them any less amazing then male superheroes.

Lol, comic nerds and their love of exaggerated body parts :slap

I agree with this.

I think your comment about Western Civilization is the exact reason grown men giggle at the thought of nipples. Western Culture overreacts to the slightest sexual overtone in such a ridiculous fashion that we have people comparing nipples through clothes to porn.


 
I see naked people multiple times a week (nurse, not creeper), so needless to say the nipples don't bother me.

I don't think they are absolutely necessary, but it's not a big deal either. She's fully clothed, so who cares. If Harley was having a nip slip then we'd have a problem.

Side note: she'll be here tomorrow, excited!!!
 
Back
Top