David22Lee
Super Freak
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2009
- Messages
- 361
- Reaction score
- 1
I agree with the teeth. It's lined up a bit too "perfectly" on the statue compared to the movie prop. But either way, I can't wait to get mine. Still a fantastic looking piece.
Statue Prime 1 Terminator Endoskeleton statue
- Thread starter darthblitzwing
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
I agree with the teeth. It's lined up a bit too "perfectly" on the statue compared to the movie prop. But either way, I can't wait to get mine. Still a fantastic looking piece.
csutkakoma
Super Freak
The hoses are at the right places.
Probably you just have to pose them to look right like at the prototype pieces.
Last edited:
Centurion
Super Freak
Nice! Looking forward to the pics from the collectors.
On what movie is that one based on? Because this is NOT the 84 Arnold Terminator! Plenty of wrong details. And as you guys already pointed out, the whole dentition is wrong. Damn, the Horizon vinyl kit from ages ago was more accurate.
David22Lee
Super Freak
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2009
- Messages
- 361
- Reaction score
- 1
Sure there are a couple of minor inaccuracies, but this is still the most overall accurate endo statue to date (that's not life-size). I definitely wouldn't call the old Horizon kit more accurate than this.
csutkakoma
Super Freak
Exactly that. They are WAY too perfect, which is what throws it off fully to me.
I would'nt buy this either. The skull makes or breaks the endoskeleton to me.
With that being said:
HT QS and Genisys endos are superior, to me personally, over this, as the menacing glare is just better.
Now for your second, more informed thought.
More informed?! Sounds a bit arrogant, doesn?t it?
Did you even look at the pics, man?
I did a sketch and funnily enough I drew a curved line over the tip of the teeth. Right first and then copied it over to the left.
They almost peak the exact same way, but comparing them deeper has shown that the problems is not how the peak, but how the teeth alighn altogether.
The ones on the right just look WAY to uniform, which is the THE MAIN problem. The original prop one's just are organically inserted, with mistakes and kinks an dirt, etc.
The look on the right doesn't give me one bit. Angled eyes would've helped too though.
csutkakoma
Super Freak
I agree with the teeth and on the proto they were better but it doesn't bother me and it is not a big deal IMO. No statue will be perfect. Not even the life size endo is. Same thing with the P1 jungle hunter. I bought it and everybody crapping in their pants just how awesome and fantastic it is and it is the defenetive jungle hunter yet it is way less accurate than the endoskeleton.
csutkakoma
Super Freak
I am aware of that. He posed it wrong probably since they are movable.
clutch
Super Freak
They definitely cheapened out on the teeth.
Python
Super Freak
The jaw pistons at the side of his nose are placed incorrectly also, but over all this thing looks pretty good imo. If they make a T2 endo in a smaller scale, I'm in!
- Joined
- May 2, 2017
- Messages
- 2,116
- Reaction score
- 348
They stated they would fix the teeth, but they didn't. And even though they are too perfect (look like dentures) some quick shading/weathering should fix it up well enough. Overall, I'm still stoked to ad him to the collection.
Yeah despite some minor issues this still looks like it would be an incredible piece to have on display. And I think he looks pretty damn menacing myself.
I have no idea what everyone is talking about with the the teeth.
Looks damn great to me.
The stuff people complain about.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Looks damn great to me.
The stuff people complain about.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
clutch
Super Freak
For two thousand dollars, I can complain all I want.
Agreed.
