Hot Toys 1:6 Iron Man 2 Mark IV

[Vaako]

just too many iron man figures , if you want them all i suppose you have to be really rich

 

[DinoLast]

Uh, I'd make do if the figure could just be the same scaled size as the CG suit. The prop suit in the above photo looks fat and bulky, which is understandable considering there's an actual dude in it.

The CGI suit looks just as bulky from the Sky Dive clip.
<object width="853" height="505"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/6o1wind1iUc&hl=en_GB&fs=1&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/6o1wind1iUc&hl=en_GB&fs=1&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="853" height="505"></embed></object>
From my point of view the streamline suits are the MK V and VI

 

[Badism]

It does really look too skinny. Maybe the pics of the figure will showcase it better than the teaser. As for those pics on page 6 from the movie, I never realized how chunky the suit could look, even the neck is really short.

Something looks off about Tony in the suit here. Like he's stubby and tall at the same time. I don't remember the Mark III looking so wide-set.

What I don't understand is how anyone can notice Tony in that pic. I"m just thinking MMMMmmmmmm, Pepper!

 

[plasmid303]

I dunno. Maybe it's the angle, but the prop suit looks bloated compared to the CG suit, especially around the mid-section in profile.

 

[Centrocal]

Anyone else notice the leg has a dent in it?

 

[mr.thrifty]

I dunno. Maybe it's the angle, but the prop suit looks bloated compared to the CG suit, especially around the mid-section in profile.

Middle aged IM

Anyone else notice the leg has a dent in it?

Probably made of rubber/foam.

 

[Centrocal]

Yes obviously, but my concern is thats actually in the film Like the 'metal' got wrinkled when he stood up after make-up and no one caught it

 

[mr.thrifty]

I'm sure there are lot's of things like this you would catch if watched frame by frame.

I wonder why if you're gonna leak a photo, it would be one with one of those "mistakes".

 

[plasmid303]

Anyone else notice the leg has a dent in it?

wow first time I noticed that. Has anyone mentioned before that the legs in that pic are of the Mark III design, not the Mark IV or VI?

Looks like Mark III legs in below pic

What the Mark IV legs look like

EDIT: Hmmm, the 'dent' is explained. They ARE the Mark III legs in the IM2 promo shot above...but on the Mark IV armor...

 

[dedguy]

I'm pretty sure the legs in the above photo are composited in there.

 

[Centrocal]

So he just wearing different Iron man pants? Like " Where are my Mark 4 pants ?! aw screw it Im late "

 

[mr.thrifty]

Thanks Guys..... now all I see are the dents..

 

[plasmid303]

I'm pretty sure the legs in the above photo are composited in there.

Why would they do that?

 

[mr.thrifty]

So he just wearing different Iron man pants? Like " Where are my Mark 4 pants ?! aw screw it Im late "

Well someone sold TDK motorcycle suits, so maybe this will be next..

now that I think about it.. I might buy a Mark III helmet for my bike if it was made well..

 

[daikkenaurora]

Looks nice... but I want Black Widow.

 

[Sachiel]

Why would they do that?

Because you would see his underwear if they didn't?

 

[plasmid303]

Because you would see his underwear if they didn't?

Quite right.

But I meant why would they composite the mark III legs onto the Mark IV armor if it is a photomanipulated image.

 

[JKKS]

They did the same thing in the second trailer with the donut scene.
I mean, the 3D render of a new suit litteraly take ages to be completed. They used the Mk3 legs cause they already have a full render of it.

 

[Minimodel]

They did the same thing in the second trailer with the donut scene.

That is the doughnut scene

 

[The Ringer]

Hopefully we see the specs soon.