xr6.turbo
Super Freak
Mine arrived today i got Ex #80 ![Joy :joy :joy](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/old/joy.gif)
![Joy :joy :joy](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/old/joy.gif)
Seems like those dots on the surface of the Deino's skull is a real letdown to some folks....
I'm also not so happy with it but luckly, the one I have doesn't sticks out too much in person, and the blood looks okay. The only thing that really bugs me is that the color of the teeth is almost identical to the color of the skin of the jaws.
My friend received a dio with a really awful paint job (The dots on his not only sticks out too much, they are uniform in size and arrangement and it really gives an unnatural look) compared to mind and I think certain pieces are suffering from the same horrendous paint app issues.
cool narrative,. though it does explain that the deinosuchus is oversized by about 5 ft. On average they grew to about 32 ft with a 4.3 ft skull. the largest known specimen at an estimate 40ft with a skull estimate of about 5.2ft. Another thing to know is deinosuchus and p.tubicen where actually never found at the same site i just found this out myself here. https://www.nmnaturalhistory.org/science/bulletins/35/sci_bulletin35_2.pdf. They seam to be separated by some 1million years. P crytocristatus, kritosaurus or anasazisaurus would have been better candidates for the sculpt.
I give you....destroyed Dienosuchus
Chris
So plausibility can save this piece ? Awesome ! heh..heh
So you canceled your Velociraptor Dio ? I can't complain really, I'm getting it but only barely...if it comes down to it these pieces do have re-sale value afterall.
Been saying that myself, that the Deinosuchus in this diorama is gargantuan, but we can still hardly take what we have of Deinosuchus fossil specimens as the sole range for the very largest these organisms could become, particularly given the scarcity the fossil record provides for D.rugosus. With Deinosuchus it's important to keep in mind that the size varied widely depending upon the organism's region. For example, the most densely populated region for D.rugosus was in the southeastern US (Coastal Plan region); in this area where the population was densest, ~32 feet is a close approximation to an average size. However, the shores of the Interior Seaway (area corresponding to present Montana and Wyoming) would have sported truly monstrous creatures, albeit in a smaller population than the southeast; in this region one could be more likely to find D.rugosus specimens closer to the 36-40 foot mark, and sporting skulls closer to the 4.5-5 foot range. I take the animal to be an extremely old male, unlike what the story conveys - again this is grounded in crocodilian growth slowing but not ceasing with age, as well as males being the larger sex. I wouldn't hazard for the animal to definitively being P.tubicen and not a separate member of the genus, being that the animal is a juvenile. Were it an adult I would certainly agree.
Discrepancy in timeframe is often where I find fault with even the coolest pieces. I recall a member posted shots of a T.rex and D.rugosus diorama, whereas the two animals didn't even exist at the same period of time (T.rex wouldn't come on the scene until several million years after the extinction of Deinosuchus).
I could talk about this piece ad infinitum.I hope to discuss the Velociraptor piece as well, though admittedly with much less of a personal touch as I have, with a heavy heart, cancelled my pre-order... Ah well. I look forward to the pics you gents and ladies will no doubt post.
![]()
I give you....destroyed Dienosuchus
Chris
Enter your email address to join: