kl241
Super Freak
- Joined
- May 12, 2007
- Messages
- 8,527
- Reaction score
- 19
The '89 Batmobile is the only thing worth producing from that film.
You must like eating cr0w.
The '89 Batmobile is the only thing worth producing from that film.
I would consider a Keaton Bats because despite my dislike for the movie the armor is iconic and provides a great deal of nostalgia for me.
Nicholson Joker, no. My feelings on his "performance" are well known.
WOW! You don't like the movie and you don't like Nicholson's performance?!
I had no idea!
The '89 Batmobile is the only thing worth producing from that film.
He can't help it. He's an "Insufferable S.O.B."
It looks fantastic, hopefully the rights over the 1960s show can be settled and we could get figures to go with it.
They are completely ____ed. WB owns the characters but 20th Century Fox owns the show itself, the design of the Batmobile, the design of the costumes are all partly owned by various entities. If this Batmobile actually comes out then it shows that the red tape is being cut through but there were so many ____ed up deals done and people unpaid or unlicensed its the reason why its not out on DVD except the movie which I believe is owned by WB outright. The thing is the Batman designs aren't different throughout so WB has to deal with Fox and other folks as well. Huge cluster____.
I just can't believe you actually laughed at that...
and contrary-ness:In my opinion, the Batmobile in Forever wasn't very good...
was funny as hell....and sucks ass.
Why can't you ever be polite and just say, "In my opinion, the Batmobile in Forever wasn't very good", or "I didn't like the Forever Batmobile". so rude.
The Batmobile in Forever sucks.
In my opinion, the Batmobile in Forever wasn't very good, and sucks ass.
Enter your email address to join: