Anyone felt 1/6 has hit a bottle neck in terms of realism?

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
--

Let's see . . . and away we go!

1. GI JOE, pretty much anything female figure, military, figures inspired by films, comic book related figures.

2. Primarily 1:6 with a few deviations into 1:12 and 1:18.

3.

4. Hard to cut out.

5. I'll be dead and buried with my 1:6 collection before I reach the age of 60.

Wow, this is so typical Chung.
 
--

Let's see . . . and away we go!

1. GI JOE, pretty much anything female figure, military, figures inspired by films, comic book related figures.

2. Primarily 1:6 with a few deviations into 1:12 and 1:18.

3.

4. Hard to cut out.

5. I'll be dead and buried with my 1:6 collection before I reach the age of 60.


Wow, this is so typical Chung.

...except his collection was sold on Ebay. :monkey1
 
But his expression of his opinion was classic Chung. We should be thankful for his proving to us we can't take it with us. It's nice to have certainty.
 
I think huge industry sea changes happen every 7-11 years. I remember when the McFarlane Movie Maniacs were the pinnacle of realism in toys; how times have changed. Another series of innovations peaked recently, so I am thinking we will probably see another long lull, unless some bolt of lighting company comes out of the blue with hyper-hyper-hyper realistic toys. I could see that maybe happening in other industries, but not this one
 
Back
Top