It’s a shame these weren’t released with a Peli Motto figure. Would have been all in then.
A lot of attachments that stay in the box. The additional droids will at least be displayed by most people.But didn’t that R2 come with a crap ton of attachments and compartments? These don’t have anything. A basic droid, a Wall-E without tracks, and a Rice-Paddy Droid. Seems a bit steep.
Also, if reuse potential had any bearing on pricing, you’d assume characters comprised of mostly reused parts would be a bit cheaper.If they make it cheaper, they sell it more, and still cover the cost of moulds.
I don't buy this unique mould excuse any more. If they are unique, costly, and don't have high demand, then don't produce it and focus on key characters. If you decided to produce it, don't hind behind mould cost excuses.
I blame Disney for all their crap content recently.I was at Toys R US in Vancouver and they seemed to have fully stock three shelves with Ultimate figures. They were all priced at $59.99 + 12% tax. There were a few pieces I would have like in my collection but at that price I couldn't care less. No desire to buy even one. Same applied to Hot Toys recently I couldn't care less with their releases.
That’s actually a good point. Granted these three aren’t as important but R5 and R2 are the same price and you’re getting two more droids. On the other hand R2 had electronics whereas these don’t.Deluxe R2-D2 alone was $255 something now people have the audacity to complain about this set price ?
But kind of cheating Cobb Vanth as a Boba Fett variant but not a variant may have also raised his price.Also, if reuse potential had any bearing on pricing, you’d assume characters comprised of mostly reused parts would be a bit cheaper.
Cobb Vanth’s pricing certainly didn’t benefit one bit from all the reused Boba armour.