Search results

Don't worry they'll find something else to complain about

Wake me up when Inart makes moving eyes as realistic as this

Joker kind of hid it but you make a comparison between the Inart's Joker, Pennywise, and Gandalf in comparison with their competitors and the eyes look terrible. The eyelids scaled to life size would be like half an inch wide. For Gandalf, without the dark eyeshadow, it's clear how deeply...

Huge miss on this supposed elite tailoring by the people over at INART. Pretty much a self own considering they were competing against a a product that was already released a year ago and its at best a wash if not worse than the Hot Toy when taking into account the price.

What figure is Inart releasing that isn't a re-release of a competitor's?

Fanboys will trash a figure because it isn't "movie accurate" but if the company takes artistic license to change something they'll let it slide if they like it.

We're bragging about years of experience in collecting children's dollies now? :ROFLMAO:

That's a very rosey interpretation of what Inart is doing ;) One could easily accuse Inart of doing what many criticize Hot Toys of doing, being greedy and safe, by basing their entire 2-3 year plan on IP that have already been explored and executed to various degrees of success by other companies.

I hate to break it to you, but you are collecting dolls whether they come with rooted hair or sculpted hair.

Augtoys looks better

Next he's going to complain why Iron Man doesn't come with an AK 47 and why John wick doesn't come with a kryptonite spear...

The correct answer is to buy both (and Garfield as well).

So it's confirmed that the Joker used a rock stand that is similar to the Indy one thst wraps around the ankle

Honest question, how is Kit the authority on Inart's shipping timeline? I know QS blamed Spec Fiction for the delay but I'm dubious that it's the retailers fault.

*and is still releasing Joker* .... Lmao

It could mean something, but in this case it really doesn't. The biggest issues that most people had with the movie weren't addressed by the extra 30 mins.

I was referring to both the critic and user submitted reviews on IMDb, metacritic, and RT. BOTH are valuable data points to objectively interpret how a movie performed in the eyes of the general public. Secondly, Snyder not being able to make a coherent movie acceptable to the mass audiences...

No where unless you live in Hong Kong and lined up to get the rooted for retail.

7.2 for a niche cut that has literally 1/10 of the reviews as the original cut is an obvious case of sample bias. Anyone who actually willingly bought the DVD was already a fan and would be inclined to give it a higher rating. Also, bringing up Amazon reviews is a joke right? Daredevil has a...

1. I wasn't the one who brought it up. 2. RT, Metacritic, Cinemascores are the only "objective" consensus of how a movie performed among a wide range of audiences. You don't have to agree with the score and you may dislike or like a movie way more than the score indicates, but it is a good...