Michael Crawford
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2005
- Messages
- 5,233
- Reaction score
- 45
How can you agree 100% with somthing he didnt say? He didnt say it was off, he just said the sculpt went by the blueprints instead of the model of the shark.JAWS said:Great review. I agree 100% about the sculpt being off from the front. Head and mouth are to small but from the side this sculpt is dead on.
owtkasted said:How can you agree 100% with somthing he didnt say? He didnt say it was off, he just said the sculpt went by the blueprints instead of the model of the shark.
I too agree that the mouth is a little small when compared to the Bruce shark. But you had a good point when saying that a lot of footage is of a real great white. This sculpt is a happy medium between the 2, which is not a bad thing I think.Michael Crawford said:Uh...I could have swore I said the sculpt wasn't movie accurate...that's why I went through the trouble of pointing out why I though it was off. Am I confused?
I thought you said it was more lifelike like to the blueprints and the movie version was off and unrealistic.Michael Crawford said:Uh...I could have swore I said the sculpt wasn't movie accurate...that's why I went through the trouble of pointing out why I though it was off. Am I confused?
owtkasted said:I thought you said it was more lifelike like to the blueprints and the movie version was off and unrealistic.
Enter your email address to join: